Search for: "York v York"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 52,890
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Ripple’s XRP token is not a security and did not constitute an investment contract when sold on the secondary market; this was the first court to decide that a digital asset challenged by the SEC was not a security.[10] ESG The SEC also continued its focus on ESG, with several new actions relating to what the agency viewed as misleading ESG claims. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:44 pm
” And online at Vox, Ian Millhiser has an essay titled “The Supreme Court seeks a middle path between following the law and blowing up the government; SEC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:37 pm
In Coalition for TJ v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:31 pm
In Daiwa Corporate Advisory LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his employment". [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his employment". [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:02 am
“Where the release is unambiguous, a court may not look to extrinsic evidence to [*3]determine the parties’ intent” (Burgos v New York Presbyt. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
# # #DECISION200 Haven Owner, LLC v D. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
Since that time frame wasn't met here, the AD2 concluded that the Family Court providently decided that it lacked the requisite jurisdiction and left the underlying order undisturbed.Clearly, there was no kidding around here.# # #DECISIONMatter of C. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 12:36 pm
Fund LLC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:38 am
See generally Lisa Zornberg, Beyond the Constitution: Is the New York Get Legislation Good Law? [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:01 am
Jim Dempsey and Michael Nelson take us through some of the possibilities: It was all about AI accelerationists v. decelerationists. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:20 am
Georgia and Wilkinson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
City of New York, 921 F.3d 337 (2d Cir. 2019) Cummings v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 2:00 am
Hillary Schneller (Center for Reproductive Rights), Diana Kasdan (Center for Reproductive Rights), Risa Kaufman (New York University), Alex Wilson (Center for Reproductive Rights), Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
In the November 7 oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:34 am
For interested readers, here are links to recent articles on Ng v Asquared and O’Mahony v Whiston. [read post]