Search for: "A John Doe Corporation"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 5,608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2016, 9:12 am
John Huntsman, Jr. will provide opening remarks. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:24 am
LLC deadlock’s been on my mind more than usual of late, after interviewing LLC maven John Cunningham for a podcast and last week co-presenting with John a webinar on the subject for the ABA Young Lawyer’s Division. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 2:04 pm
Adverse human rights impacts cannot be offset and companies should first and foremost consider the effect of their core operations on people ahead of unrelated corporate philanthropy/CSR activities.4. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 1:28 pm
” The information sought by the John Doe summons leaves little to the imagination. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 5:17 pm
As Columbia Law School Professor John Coffee details in his November 17, 2016 New York Law Journal article entitled “Clawbacks in the Age of Trump” (here), despite these statutory revisions, the use of “extreme incentive compensation” continues to motivate corporate behavior. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 2:41 pm
November 2016 | John G. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 4:11 am
The fact is Lego listens to its customers and does have a record of corporate social responsibility. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:33 am
” A third theme embraced one of Rosenkranz’s strongest points: the difference between the charters for Freddie Mac (the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) and Fannie Mae. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
” In an op-ed in The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), John Blume weighs in on Moore v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:12 am
John Park and Jim Walsh will discuss sanctions with Jonathan D. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 6:31 am
In an artful, 17-page opinion, Judge Beth Labson Freeman posed the question, “How does age factor into one’s Googleyness? [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 11:27 am
Chief Justice John Roberts was less persuaded by Carroll’s argument. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:59 am
” “[T]here does not appear to be any obvious business purpose associated with altering the number of non-voting shares,” i.e., the company received no additional capitalization and the shareholders received no apparent benefit such as increased distributions. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 12:27 am
And here’s an excerpt from the company’s earnings release: Also see the July-August issue of “The Corporate Counsel,” which delves into the broad Enforcement requests from the SEC in the non-GAAP area… Broc & John: Disclosure Overload John & I had a lot of fun taping our 2nd “news-like” podcast. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:14 am
The first is that corporate decision-makers care only about the short term. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
It is well-established that Congress “does not alter the fundamental details of a regulatory scheme in vague terms or ancillary provisions—it does not, one might say, hide elephants in mouseholes. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 7:59 am
“An unnecessary adventure that won’t further compliance,” is how attorney John C. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:18 pm
’ They looked up and said, ‘Wow, corporations are spying on everybody. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 6:21 am
But the ordinance does allow officials to attend events “in their official capacity,” he added. [read post]
