Search for: "ALLEN v. US " Results 2081 - 2100 of 2,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 2:30 am by INFORRM
The High Court recently found against a media organisation under the former Trade Practices Act in ACCC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 3:15 pm
Astra offers no convincing reason why Emert does not apply.2 See also Geneva Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
His passenger, Corey Allen Annis, age 23 was injured, but because of his seatbelt his was thought not to have lived. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:25 am by SHG
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
See, e.g., Craig Allen Nard, The Law of Patents 34 (2008) (asserting PTO grants patents on 39% of applications); Brief of the Boston Patent Law Ass'n as Amicus Curiae in Support of Genentech, Inc., on the Merits at 5, Medimmune, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Paul Keller, Allen & Overy LLP Litigator’s perspective: defense is used in vast majority of his cases, though there’s been client-driven momentum away from asserting it. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:32 am by John L. Welch
ALLENS NATURALLY Refused Registration over ALEN AMERICAS for Cleaning PreparationsTest Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Do You Have a Beef with This Section 2(d) Decision? [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:33 am by Amy Howe
The law at the center of the court’s decision in Allen v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:45 pm by Administrator
” -=-=-=-=- So that brings us to the case of Renico v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
  This seems to fly in the face the idea of presumption of innocent under section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.[17] Although the idea of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at trial seems to help an accused, this is not the same standard that a prosecutor has to use in deciding whether to charge someone – the standard is lower: “reasonable prospects for conviction. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 2:18 pm by Russell Spivak, Jordan Brunner
If you are finding Lawfare useful in these times, please consider making a contribution to support what we do. [read post]