Search for: "AT&T"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 881,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
The opponent filed an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to maintain the opposed patent in amended form.Claim 1 before the Board read (in English translation):1. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
[1] The request for grant of a European patent for this divisional application was received on 23 November 2004. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:40 pm
By Robert Hockett Neil has been so persistent, so lucid, and so thorough in addressing current fears -- which for the most part have struck me as what I'll call 'crocodile' fears -- about the longterm U.S. fiscal position that I have felt no need to comment on the subject here thus far. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
This is an appeal filed by the opponents after the Opposition Division had maintained the opposed patent in amended form.The Board inter alia discussed clarity and sufficiency of disclosure of the main request, claim 1 of which read:1. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 11:01 am
This opposition appeal decision contains a statement on the availability to the public of a printed document.The patent proprietor pointed out that documents A2, A5, F2, F4, and F7 showed that the skilled person was able to measure the pH value under certain conditions.*** Translation of the French original ***[4.2.1] The [patent proprietor] referred to document A2page 17 of which teaches how to use a LiCl solution in ethanol as an alternative electrolyte in electrodes to be used in non-acqueous… [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
Board member Gianciotto is about to draw the Article 12(4) RPBA sword ...This is an examination appeal.Board 3.2.06 had to deal with the question of whether the applicant could be allowed to switch from one invention to the other.[2.1] Claim 1 corresponds to originally filed claim 8 which formed part of the second invention during search. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Now that the Boards of appeal are not competent for the review of invitations to pay additional search fees under the PCT (Rule 40.2 PCT; old-timers will remember the “W” decisions) any more, unity of invention has become a relatively rare issue in Board decisions. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
In this examination appeal the applicant contested the public availability of document D1.[2.1] The appellant did not contest that D1 had been on the internet before the earliest priority date of the present application (19 October 2005) at the URL indicated in the European search report. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
This is another opposition appeal case where the Board of appeal refused to postpone oral proceedings (OPs).*** Translation of the French original ***[IV] By fax received on September 26, 2012, the professional representative of the appellant has requested the Board to postpone the OPs to be held on September 28, 2012, because he, the only European patent attorney of the law firm, had to travel abroad at the end of the day because of an unforeseen infringement case. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:01 pm
Claims 1 and 2 on file in this examination appeal case read (in English translation):1. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
This is an appeal against the rejection of the opposition against the patent under consideration.Independent claim 13 of the main request (as granted) read as follows:13. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
In this case the patent proprietor filed amended claims directed at a rinse aid (Klarspülmitel) in which one particular hydrocarbon radical was “optionally” substituted by hydroxyl groups. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Tim Mulvaney, Secretary of the AALS Property Seciton, passes along a fun announcement. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm
Sometimes patent drafters - by choice or for necessity - resort to drafting claims containing somewhat exotic parameter features that are not known in the prior art. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
This is a revocation appeal.The Opposition Division (OD) had revoked the patent on the basis that the patent as amended according to the auxiliary requests did not meet the requirement of A 123(3). [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
Dinosaurs may not be extinct. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:56 am
In Religious Arbitration, Scripture Is the Rule of Law http://ow.ly/UbCKTFiled under: Conflict [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 10:26 am
Professor David A. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 4:34 am
Professor Joseph Thai joined the law faculty in 2003. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
[2] The main request under consideration was filed as the [patent proprietor’s] fourth auxiliary request with letter of 4 February 2013, i.e. one month before the oral proceedings (OPs) before the board. [read post]
