Search for: "CF-3" Results 2081 - 2100 of 2,385
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Not long ago, I have reported two cases (here and here) where the Board found auxiliary requests inadmissible because they could have been filed or were withdrawn after having been filed before the Opposition Division (OD). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am by INFORRM
Compared to that, the social utility or value to be attached to identification, as such, is relatively low: cf. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 4:07 am
Levine: (1) good, FDA approved warnings about the precise risk at issue (mentioning it 4 times, including in bold-face, allcaps print), (2) prior, specific FDA review of the precise risk and precise medical procedure involved, resulting in ratification of the label's language; (3) the case fits within one of the six situations where the FDA has taken a position that there should be preemption; and (4) of no suggestion of any regulatory violation or withholding of information from the… [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
"Diversity" certainly cannot justify a race-exclusive school (cf. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 1:37 pm by Jack Goldsmith
”  Then in paragraph 3, Bissonnette agreed not to disclose SCI (which is the most sensitive form of classified information, the information found in Special Access Programs) or any other classified information. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:52 am
” The federal definition of misprision requires that, “(1) the principal committed and completed the felony alleged; (2) the defendant had knowledge of the fact; (3) the defendant failed to notify the authorities; and (4) the defendant took affirmative steps to conceal the crime of the principal. [read post]
31 May 2014, 6:19 pm by Michael Froomkin
Listed in declining order of privacy protection they were: (1) traceable anonymity, (2) untraceable anonymity, (3) untraceable pseudonymity, and (4) traceable pseudonymity. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am by Dave
The aim of the provisions relating to intentional homelessness would then be circumvented. [24] There are a number of subsidiary points made by Lord Reed at [12]-[16]: (1) the reaction to Puhlhofer involved symmetry being produced between homelessness and intentionality; (2) the affordability regs meant that the concession made in Din (which was probably wrongly made even at that time) that the family could have remained in the accommodation would not be made today; (3)… [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503 (1986), and providing that members of military were entitled to wear religious headgear); cf Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 6:35 am by Jan von Hein
Although Art. 32 (1) (a) Brussels Ibis Regulation states that the time when the document is lodged with the courts is decisive on which court is “the court first seised” in terms of Art. 29 Brussels Ibis Regulation, there has been dissent among German Courts whether the same is true when the service has failed due to a missing or poor translation under the EU Service Regulation (Regulation EC No 1393/2007; cf. also the French Cour de Cassation, 28.10.2008, 98 Rev. [read post]