Search for: "California Employment Law Letter"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 2,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2009, 4:31 am
As a California tax attorney, I don't know and the law remains unclear whether the penalty applies to those who are employees and who make regular tax payments by having employee withholding done by their employer. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:26 am
Law, 528 F.3d 888 (D.C. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 6:10 am
"#154 HealthBlawgDavid Harlow's Health Care Law Blog hosted on World Health Day.#155 California Blog of AppealGreg May says, "Asking me to improve on Blawg Review numbers 1 through 154 is a pretty tall order, and not one that I'll claim to accomplish. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 6:05 pm
s bonus plan cannot be deemed to violate California law. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
Supreme Court* Public Citizen's most recent Sup Ct Watch List here* SCOTUSblog's most recent Petitions to Watch here * Ross Runkel's US Sup Ct Employment Law Cases- Pending and Decided herePetition for Cert Granted:Crawford v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 3:06 pm
California Appellate Districts, December 16, 2008 Arcadia Dev. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Supreme Court Public Citizen's most recent Sup Ct Watch List here SCOTUSblog's most recent Petitions to Watch here Ross Runkel's US Sup Ct Employment Law Cases- Pending and Decided herePetition for Cert Granted: Crawford v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:19 pm
In the 1970s, California passed an obscure Labor Law that prohibits employers from asking prospective employees about minor marijuana-related convictions that are more than two years old. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 6:49 pm
California law generally prohibits an employer from making deductions from an employee’s wages except as required by state and federal law for certain withholdings (eg. taxes) or as authorized by the employee for medical/health benefits or pension plan contributions. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:31 pm
However, as with many issues related to California wage and hour law, several conditions and potential pitfalls exist. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:17 am
NLRB Law Memo 11/12/2008 by LawMemo - First in Employment Law. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 5:07 am
A no-match letter could serve as evidence that a company violated immigration law. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
Weber Company neglects to defend its mark (Class 46) Serbia Balkan anti-counterfeiting - Serbia and Macedonia customs authorities border closures (RelatIP) South Africa Debate about abandonment of the Springbok, South Africa's traditional rugby emblem (Afro-IP) Spain Geographic indications v trade marks: Supreme Court confirms refusal of Spanish trade mark application for VINO DE LA TIERRA ARRIBES DEL DUERO (translation: wine from the land of Aribbes del Duero)… [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
Employers may recall that last year a federal judge in the Northern District of California enjoined implementation of the DHS’ no-match rule. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 2:35 pm
You must keep a copy of all documents relating to your employment status, including offer letters, employment contracts, employee handbooks, codes of conduct, compliance manuals and bulletins, benefit plans, deferred compensation plans, stock options plans, restricted stock plans, performance appraisals, bonus awards, promissory notes, records of payments and/or forgiveness of promissory notes, letters, email communications, and memoranda. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(IP Law Blog) Presidential politics and IP (IP Law Blog) US General - Decisions District court tosses trade secret misappropriation suit filed by 24 Hour Fitness USA against Bally Total Fitness Holding and its CEO (Law360) State appeals court acquits Frank Herbert McClain who was sentences to seven years in prison for allegedly stealing trade secrets from former employer Didrickson Associates (Law360) US General - Lawsuits and strategic steps … [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:06 pm
DHS will not use anemployer's receipt of a no-match letter as evidence to find that it violated the law by knowingly employing unauthorized workers as long as the employer follows the safe harbor rules. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: President signs PRO IP Bill into law (The Counterfeit Blog) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Techdirt) (Out-Law) (Counterfeit Chic) (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (Law360) (US Intellectual Property Law & Policy News) CAFC vacates ITC ban on importing Qualcomm chips: Kyocera v International Trade Commission… [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:00 pm
So far, there are a dozen letters on file urging the court to review the case, including one from the California State Legislature and the Attorney General. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 10:40 pm
A single clause in the parties' letter agreement which allowed either party to terminate at will did not transform that relationship into an employment relationship. [read post]
