Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 48,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2011, 1:19 am
However, in one case Akorita v Marina Heights (St Leonards) Ltd [2011] UKUT 255 (LC), the Upper Tribunal did make a comment about the correct approach to s.20C, LTA 1985, that I do think is worth bringing to your attention. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:19 am
However, in one case Akorita v Marina Heights (St Leonards) Ltd [2011] UKUT 255 (LC), the Upper Tribunal did make a comment about the correct approach to s.20C, LTA 1985, that I do think is worth bringing to your attention. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:40 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:15 am
The recent decision of Pachaluck Estate v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
Judgment Released: April 5, 2011 Link to Judgment The costs of an abandoned summary judgment motion under new Rule 20.06, which eliminates the presumption in favour of substantial indemnity costs, should be approached as follows: (1) The respondent on the motion for summary judgment is presumed to be entitled to costs payable forthwith on a partial indemnity [...] [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:07 am
Circuit, a court that has previously vacated SEC rules for inadequate cost-benefit analysis, issued its harshest criticism yet of the agency when it vacated the proxy access rule for failure to consider the rule's effect... [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 6:00 pm
Having an estate-planning document can speed up the transfer process, decrease costs, and promote family harmony. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:25 am
Medical Malpractice Informed consent; costs and interest In a claim alleging negligence in the duty to provide informed consent, the rule remains that a physician must disclose "what … a reasonable person in the patient's position [would] want to know in order to make an intelligent decision with respect to the choices of treatment or diagnosis;" and [...] [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:40 am
Helden v Strathmore [2011] EWCA Civ 542 contains lots of useful footnotes and pointers on different issues, so it’s worth a read. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:40 am
Helden v Strathmore [2011] EWCA Civ 542 contains lots of useful footnotes and pointers on different issues, so it’s worth a read. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 10:39 am
Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 3:16 pm
The first case, Rimini Street v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:28 am
In the published opinion Doe v Boyle, Docket No. 320102 (September 22, 2015), after a lengthy battle, the Court of Appeals awarded court-appointed guardian ad litem Thomas Woods costs and attorney's fees for his services on a personal injury suit as a guardian ad litem for the defendant minor child. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:51 pm
General Motors Corp. (1992) 2 Cal.App.4th 893, 897 [finding $5,908.26 to be cost of average civil appeal].Collisson & Kaplan v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:32 am
The Sixth Circuit reinforced its 2003 en banc decision that allows for cost-splitting provisions in arbitration awards in the decision it issued Tuesday in the case of Mazera v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:44 pm
Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:00 pm
Nick Bolter and Annie Websper authored an article for World Trademark Review about issues surrounding publicity orders and passing off claims following the High Court of England & Wales decision in the case of Philip Warren & Sons v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:00 pm
Nick Bolter and Annie Websper authored an article for World Trademark Review about issues surrounding publicity orders and passing off claims following the High Court of England & Wales decision in the case of Philip Warren & Sons v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:00 pm
Nick Bolter and Annie Websper authored an article for World Trademark Review about issues surrounding publicity orders and passing off claims following the High Court of England & Wales decision in the case of Philip Warren & Sons v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:00 pm
Nick Bolter and Annie Websper authored an article for World Trademark Review about issues surrounding publicity orders and passing off claims following the High Court of England & Wales decision in the case of Philip Warren & Sons v. [read post]
