Search for: "Davis v. THE STATE"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 6,170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Coventry Health Care of Missouri v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:34 am
And in Davis v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
Peter Odili, at the state High Court, Port Harcourt. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:01 pm
Johnston v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 11:15 am
”); see United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:33 am
” In The Atlantic, Laura McKenna discusses Endrew F. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
One of the cases—Davila v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 10:36 am
In the case, Davis v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 10:36 am
In the case, Davis v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:29 am
Superior Court, Tyrrell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
On 20 January 2017, Sir Davie Eady heard applications in the case of Daryanani -v- Ramnani. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 12:51 am
Sadly, this was precisely the situation in a case decided last October, Kafataris v Davis [2016] FCAFC 134. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
The first, Wilmington Savings v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 10:17 am
Holder v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm
Peep Beep has also examined the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgement in the joint cases C‑203/15 Tele2 Sverige AB v Postoch telestyrelsen and C‑698/15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
Davis, No. 16-6219, involves the continuing fallout from Martinez v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 12:10 pm
Davis: Whether the Supreme Court’s decisions holding that an ineffective attorney in state habeas proceedings can constitute cause to overcome a substantial claim, which would otherwise be defaulted, that the inmate’s state trial attorney was ineffective also applies to substantial but defaulted claims that an inmate’s attorney during his state appeals was ineffective. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 3:53 am
The 5-4 decision states that attorney-client privilege doesn’t exist because the former employee no longer has an ongoing principal-agent relationship with the corporation. [read post]
