Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 2081 - 2100 of 12,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2013, 7:59 am by MBettman
In a unanimous decision, the Court held that in this murder trial it was improper to admit a non-testifying accomplice’s out-of-court statements identifying the defendant through the testimony of an investigating police officer. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:02 pm by MOTP
F/K/A TRAVIS & HAMMOND, P.C., Appellee On Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2014-10648 O P I N I O N Appellant, Jeffrey L. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm
All of this was done voluntarily by the defendant almost in a bragging tone as if to say "look at all the hell I have put her through and the hell to come if she does not come around. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:13 am by Tung Yin
 I started getting media interview requests on Saturday, continuing through today, and I've now had a chance to put here some thoughts about the case. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:02 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) A few days ago I blogged about a question that some readers had asked: why hasn’t United States v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:49 pm by Gideon
After that, it’s their decision whether to pursue the charges or not and that power essentially entitles the State to force the defendant to a trial, at expense to himself or to the State, through the office of the public defender. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:07 pm by Russell Knight
I love the movie “The Break-Up” starring Vince Vaughn and Jennifer Aniston as a couple who cannot communicate effectively through their break up. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
  The defendant claimed the decedent was coming through a door at him and that he fired in self-defense. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 3:34 pm by Dennis Crouch
I wrote about this case in February 2019 under the Headline: Pepcid Complete Generic Does not Provide “Immediate Relief” and Therefore Does not Infringe. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:29 pm by Glotzer & Sweat
 The first case I think is highly relevant is the 1975 California Supreme Court decision of Li v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:44 am by Gregory Forman
How long does a child have to be in a third party’s physical possession before the Moore v. [read post]