Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 12,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2013, 8:44 am
Generally, a class action suit seeking only declaratory and injunctive relief does not bar subsequent individual suits for damages, the court noted. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:52 pm
See 29 U.S.C. [read post]
31 May 2020, 3:51 pm
This time-limit will not apply to employees who have been laid off due to COVID-related slowdowns and closures.The Regulation will apply from March 1, 2020 until six-weeks after the Government ends its March 17 emergency COVID-19 declaration. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:12 pm
On September 29, 2007, a 4-month-old girl from Noel, Mo. became entrapped in the metal bars of the bassinet and died. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:12 pm
On September 29, 2007, a 4-month-old girl from Noel, Mo. became entrapped in the metal bars of the bassinet and died. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:28 am
Currently Japan does not have a legal system to formalize same-sex marriages. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 2:00 pm
In a decision on Dec. 31 in Doe #1 v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:43 am
Jones advised decedent on October 29, 1999, through plaintiff, that the lesion was a minor nevus and was not malignant. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 4:25 am
[mensual.prensa.com]For the buyer, this translates into having to repay a mortage loan at interest rates 3.2% to 4% less than what the government considers as the "Reference Rate", under Law 65 of October 29, 2003 , as long as the home is the main residence of the borrower and its purchase value does not exceed US$62,500.What is more, if the home has a purchase value below US$16,000, the final interest rate to the borrower can be of 2%. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 5:55 pm
Does this mean that employers can always conduct surveillance on their employees? [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 11:39 am
The final rule does not change existing law. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:30 pm
But it does seem that Geithner needs to clarify his position on TARP repayment since right now his insistence on systemic health is in flagrant violation of the law. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 9:37 am
” The final rule, published on November 29, 2019, implements a proposed rule from December 4, 2018, discussed in an earlier blog post here, which is designed to eliminate this problem for small businesses.[1] What Does This Mean For Your Company? [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 6:38 pm
Dudenhoeffer12-751Issue: (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit erred by holding that respondents were not required to plausibly allege in their complaint that the fiduciaries of an employee stock ownership plan abused their discretion by remaining invested in employer stock, in order to overcome the presumption that their decision to invest in employer stock was reasonable, as required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 10:36 am
29 CFR 1630.2(l). [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:27 pm
(b) Use of a nonexistent or self-conferred certification or professional designation(e) (C) Does not have reasonable standards or procedures for monitoring and disciplining its designees or certificants for improper or unethical conduct; (D) Does not have reasonable continuing education requirements for its designees to maintain the designation or certificate(4)(b)(5) Violation of section (1) of this rule is an… [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:38 am
” 29 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 10:49 am
S194861 (Dec. 29, 2011). [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:00 am
Jones advised decedent on October 29, 1999, through plaintiff, that the lesion was a minor nevus and was not malignant. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
The EBA had held that Article 53(b) EPC does not exclude plants from patentability, even if they are obtained through an essentially biological process. [read post]
