Search for: "Does 1-58"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 2,966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 5:25 pm
Not quite sure where that is going although 2 members of team 1 will still be there after June 2013. [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:15 am
Its Capitol is, of course, the land of the 1%, a sort of amalgamation of Fashion Week, Versailles, and the KGB/CIA. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:12 am
III standing does not apply. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:02 am
Only 23% of plaintiff fee awards were $1 million or higher, while 44 percent were at or under $500,000 or under. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:35 am
Fric’s working capacity. [58] How this diminished capacity is measured is yet to be determined. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:13 am
Dick Zeller of CADRE: "Nationally, the filing of written state complaints peaked in 2004-05 (6,201) and has declined by more than 20% since then (see Table 1). [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
All 5 remain in effect. 2010 In calendar year 2010, there were 58 Section 337 complaints filed.[5] Of these 58, 21 were decided by ALJ decision and 34 by settlement (the ID for three investigations had not yet issued as of this writing). [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
Kaneka argued in opposition that (1) its corporate witness was adequately prepared for the deposition, that the information XKGC seeks (details from 11 year-old emails) is not within Kaneka’s institutional knowledge such that it can prepare another designee to testify about such information, and that XKGC’s deposition notice was too vague because it did not specifically identify the documents shown to the witness during the deposition; (2) it does not have any documents… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:43 am
The questions asked by the Bundesgerichtshof were : 1. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:47 pm
WFC Holdings Corp., No. 07-CV-9551, 2010 WL 125999, at *3 n.1 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
However, the board does not consider that the content of C5 (or C3) was divulged to the public by the fact that the notary public saw it before the filing date. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:46 pm
NRS 128.005(1) and (2); Matter of Parental Rights as to D.R.H., 120 Nev. 422, 426-27, 92 P.3d 1230, 1233 (2004); Matter of Parental Rights as to C.J.M., 118 Nev. 724, 732, 58 P.3d 188, 194 (2002). [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm
It is irrelevant to the main proceedings that the Member State concerned has not yet transposed Directive 2006/24, despite the period for doing so having expired; Directives 2002/58 ... [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:12 pm
Verex Assurance, Inc., 79 F.3d 1453, 1457–58 (5th Cir. 1996) (subrogation clause case [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
(MB) 58 (2007). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
(MB) 58 (2007). [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:59 am
The higher courts have already considered the balancing of freedom of expression with section 127, and came to this conclusion: ‘Section 127(1)(a) does of course interfere with a person’s right to freedom of expression. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 12:21 pm
S/Y Endeavor, 58 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1995), the owners of a maxi were involved in a collision with the famous J class yacht Endeavor. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:29 am
Here, however, the defendant does not seek to invalidate or repudiate either the billing statements or the retainer agreement between the parties. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:11 am
Court Rules, comment 1 on Rule 4:58 (2012). [read post]