Search for: "FRAME v FRAME" Results 2081 - 2100 of 8,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2013, 5:21 am by Florian Mueller
EP1005726 on a "turbo encoding/decoding device and method for processing frame data according to QoS":Justice Floyd determined that this patent "a) is not entitled to the priority claimed, and is therefore invalid based on Samsung's admission, b) if entitled to priority, would nevertheless have been invalid for obviousness over both Bömer and Valenti, c) if valid, would have been infringed by Apple's UMTS compliant devices." [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:50 am by Eugene Volokh
The militia, referred to in various parts of the Constitution, was understood at the Framing as involving compulsory military service. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 1:00 pm
And in abortion cases, its approach has shifted: Initially, the Court strongly disavowed inherited narratives, but in its most recent abortion case, Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:10 am
Earlier this week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an opinion in McMillan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:59 pm by KC Johnson
The Court declined to hear the appeal of a case called Martin v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:03 am by Aparajita Lath
For all orders in relation to Ajay Monga v Red Chilli Entertainment Ltd. see here. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 1:00 pm by Christine Corcos
And in abortion cases, its approach has shifted: Initially, the Court strongly disavowed inherited narratives, but in its most recent abortion case, Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:51 am
The radiologist supervising the MRI concluded the injury was "possibly several months of age," putting it within the time frame of the February accident. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 6:19 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
Two of the dissenters in Hamdi v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:16 am by Marty Lederman
Hobby Lobby Part IV -- The myth of underinclusivenessHobby Lobby Part V -- Whose Religious Exercise? [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:38 am by David Oscar Markus
  Well, Scalia has proved Rumpole wrong again as Justice Scalia ruled in favor of the 4th Amendment yesterday in the Florida drug dog case, Florida v. [read post]