Search for: "Federal, Inc." Results 2081 - 2100 of 57,577
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2023, 7:49 pm by Anthony Zaller
Ragingwire Telecommunications, Inc., the California Supreme Court examined the conflict between California’s Compassionate Use Act, (which gives a person who uses marijuana for medical purposes on a physician’s recommendation a defense to certain state criminal charges and permission to possess the drug) and Federal law (which prohibits the drug’s possession, even by medical users). [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 10:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision on Friday vacating-in-part a district court decision that granted SonicWall, Inc. summary judgment of invalidity based on a collateral estoppel decision that the CAFC had since vacated. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 10:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision on Friday vacating-in-part a district court decision that granted SonicWall, Inc. summary judgment of invalidity based on a collateral estoppel decision that the CAFC had since vacated. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:31 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Ramirez (“TransUnion”), the Workplace Class Action blog is examining how each of the federal Circuit Courts have applied this significant ruling on standing from the U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 4:29 pm by News Desk
  On February 16, 2023, the FDA issued a Warning Letter to Gary Tashjian, Owner of Arrow Reliance Inc., citing evidence of Salmonella contamination in the company’s finished products, the use of a non-permitted food additive (peroxyacetic acid) as a pathogen mitigation step, and Tashjian’s refusal to comply with federal requirements that it register with the FDA as a food facility. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 10:57 am by HRWatchdog
Departure from Federal Procedure The United States Supreme Court ruled on June 23 in Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
  During the investigation, the division determined that Monogram employed five 17-year-olds, four 16-year-olds, and two 15-year-olds in violation of federal child labor laws. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:09 pm by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html Benally, et al. v. [read post]