Search for: "Frank v. State" Results 2081 - 2100 of 4,763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Thomas Valenti
Voluntary referral is not allowed if one party is the state, if the dispute relates to recovery of property, money or other dues on behalf of the state or if the Attorney General has instituted proceedings for any offence. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:43 pm by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Sullivan, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Sunday, January 17, 2016 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Derivatives, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage,Mutual funds, No-action letters, Private funds, Risk, Risk management, Rule 18f-4, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Regulation, Swaps PECO v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:48 am by Orin Kerr
I’m also not sure it makes sense to apply the Franks v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm by Trent Dykes
  On the public pension fund side, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) and the Florida State Board of Administration each support proxy access proposals. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 8:32 am by petrocohen
He also holds an “A/V” rating from the world’s leading lawyer referral service, Martindale-Hubbell. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 am by Eric Goldman
Therefore, he fails to state a violation of the DMCA. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The privilege is intended to encourage full and frank communication between attorneys and their clients and thereby promote broader public interests in the observance of law and the administration of justice. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
Gerard Magliocca, buoyed by the ACA surviving a second Supreme Court review in King v. [read post]