Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 2081 - 2100 of 4,533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2016, 9:39 am by Michael Grossman
Arguably the most successful countries to apply the system are Sweden (its originator), the Netherlands, and Germany. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
The German Data Protection Supervisory Authorities has announced that they have randomly chosen 500 companies in Germany to investigate their transfer of personal data outside the EU. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 1:35 am by Dan Bomsztyk
The answer to both, MMGR claimed, was Germany. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:49 am by Zachary Burdette
Similarly, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg emphasized that the United States has a treaty obligation under Article V to defend its allies in Europe from foreign aggression, noting that Article V has only been invoked following the 9/11 attacks. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by Jenny Gesley
The following remarks will describe the model case in Germany and point out its differences from a class action. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 5:38 pm by Christopher E. Hoyme
  Breyer alleged the retention of IP addresses by the Republic of Germany could enable profiling of website users and other non-legitimate objectives. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 5:10 am by Jochen Buehling
€ 160 The post Germany: Kreuzgestänge, Federal Court of Justice of Germany, X ZR 103/13, 2 June 2015 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
(see ABC v Aereo in the US), while others suggest that in making a strict ruling on copyright, wider benefits to society may be lost (consider theStoererhaftung cases in Germany). [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:30 am by Eduardo Ustaran and Elizabeth Campion
The decision in Breyer may impact on the laws of Member States beyond Germany. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
In this case, the act complained of was an offer for sale in England, on the principles laid down in L’Oreal v eBay, i.e. the defendant’s website was not merely accessible from the UK but was in fact targeted at (among others) English customers.The allegedly infringing product on Heritage Audio's sitePassing-offFor passing-off, the judge noted that the CJEU had applied the Brussels I rules not only to trade mark and copyright infringement claims but also to claims based on… [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:44 am by Jonathan Bailey
It is protected by copyright in Germany until 2047, it was registered in the U.S. but not renewed, Fritz Lang (among others) lived in Germany during the production and it premiered in the U.S. on March 31, 1933, nearly two years after it’s German publication. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:06 am
Never too late 114 [week ending on Sunday 18 September] | Commissioner unveils new copyright package | Open letter from Wikimedia et al on copyright package| Globalisation, Globalisation, Globalisation| Philip Morris loses investment arbitration | EPIP highlights | 20 million thanks | Tea & trade secret theft | Patent quality conference | free wifi networks & copyright infringement | Chiefs in Intellectual Property summit | Innovation and its discontents | GS Media rapid response event… [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:24 am by Jani Ihalainen
The case of combit Software GmbH v Commit Business Solutions Ltd dealt with combit Software, a German software development and marketing company that holds the rights to the EU trademark for the word "combit" for similar goods and services. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Germany’s justice minister Heiko Maas has said that Facebook and Twitter could be held criminally responsible for racist posts by users. [read post]