Search for: "Goodwill v. Goodwill"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 2,133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2007, 10:04 pm
See DC Comics v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 9:36 am
In Edward Chapman Ladies' Shop Limited v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 3:05 pm
Sun World International Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 12:04 pm
A case from the Third Department last week illustrates that is simply not the case - Kings Mall, LLC v Wenk, 2007 NY Slip Op 05811. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 7:40 am
V. acknowledges earlier that the empirics he surveys are inconclusive. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 12:40 pm
KIS, S.A. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 2:02 pm
In Cross-Canada Auto Body Supply (Windsor) Limited v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
Was this confined merely to potential loss of sales, or did it also include potential loss of goodwill in the development of the C20 brand? [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 9:48 pm
Otto Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
We bet that was a decision Lakram didn't want delivered.For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: DS Courier Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2007, 4:23 pm
A trade mark is an entirely different commodity: when separated from its goodwill it has no value to speak of at all and the vast majority of registered trade marks are probably worth little even when attached to their goodwill. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
There are plenty of cases that show that goodwill persists after a business stops trading, since it is sustained in the mind of the relevant consumer and may be turned into real business again at a later stage - but it's unusual to find real goodwill evaporating totally into the ether. [read post]
11 May 2007, 8:48 am
., Trefren and Trefren Trust v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 8:36 am
In UMG v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 9:50 am
Back in 2005 in Troll Company A/S v Uneeda Doll Company Ltd Danish company Troll secured preliminary injunctive relief in the US to protect its fuzzy-haired Good Luck Troll doll (right) against Uneeda's predatory Wish-nik (below, left), the District Court ruling that the Wish-niks infringed copyright in the Good Luck Trolls. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:14 am
In a Houston, Texas, case, UMG v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 7:42 am
[23] V. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 4:48 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 9:23 am
Expungement Allowed - In Emall.ca Inc. et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
Ruling in favor of Fox can be justified through goodwill: someone else is gaining the goodwill from Fox's product. [read post]
