Search for: "Graham v State"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 2,167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
It can also be understood as shared perceptions of the meaning of reality backed by massive background consensus (Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms (William Rehg (trans) MIT Press, 1996); pp. 22, 322); or as biopolitics (the narratives through which social and political power may be normalized over the control and management of the bodies of the living and their relationship to physical and abstract objects and the technologies of control) (Michel Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics:… [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
The biggest trend, which harkens back to Bill Graham Archives v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:42 am
” Finally, David Kopel argues in the Washington Times that Justice Sotomayor’s recent dissent in McDonald v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
Dist. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:28 pm
This broad issue came before the United States Supreme Court in McKune v Lile, 536 US 24 (2002), which also involved the consequences of a sex offender not confessing guilt. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
As Judge Levin pointed in Morefield v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:23 am
Subsequently, in Graham v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 3:21 am
In 1892’s landmark case, “Illinois Central Railroad Company v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:07 am
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Ray v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:44 pm
Use of FBS in Cognitive Malingering The use of the Fake Bad Scale to support cognitive malingering may violate the National Academy of Neuropsychology published methods for assessing symptom validity which states “Invalid performance on a measure of personality” (such as the MMPI in this case) “cannot be used, a priori, to determine malingering of cognitive tests. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:08 am
Use of FBS in Cognitive Malingering The use of the Fake Bad Scale to support cognitive malingering may violate the National Academy of Neuropsychology published methods for assessing symptom validity which states “Invalid performance on a measure of personality” (such as the MMPI in this case) “cannot be used, a priori, to determine malingering of cognitive tests. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
IP disputes were mainly heard by Graham J (from 1969), joined by Whitford J in 1974. [read post]
