Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 7,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2017, 2:04 pm
She also failed in a judicial review of RKBC’s newly restrictive planning policy on basement developments, and of course won in the House of Lords on proprietary estoppel, but lost on unjust enrichment in Yeomans Row v Cobbe (2008) UKHL 55. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 5:11 am
The CGS board and leadership have therefore reluctantly concluded that it is necessary to close. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:17 am
Obviously the more wiggles you put in, the closer fit you get because your line can wiggle between the points it wants to get close to. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:20 am
The complaint (full text) in Canopus Realty Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:21 am
Supreme Court, including the closely watched business case Wal-Mart v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:23 pm
The fourth part looks closely at Mitchell's surprisingly complicated rule. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
SEC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
Close your blinds. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:11 am
In the same debate, Fetterman endorsed codifying Roe v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:04 am
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:10 am
Glass house and stones, etc. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:56 pm
No state will play a bigger role in the 2018 election than Florida, which has five highly competitive House races as well as very close contests for the U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm
(Viewpointe and The Clearing House were co-defendants in this lawsuit.) [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:52 am
We exchanged emails about his work on Intel v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:28 am
But in considering Gill v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:57 pm
Lamar Smith of the House Judiciary Committee. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 9:23 pm
Of course, that would violate the express voting rule for the Senate set forth in Article I (one vote per Senator), but if we think that the equal suffrage provision of Article V (quoted above) is more important, then perhaps it overrides. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 5:59 am
Take Away This case was certainly a close call. [read post]
