Search for: "In Re CAL" Results 2081 - 2100 of 5,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2009, 6:00 am
  Notably, the opinion cites Tobacco: The deterrent effect of a restitution remedy under the unfair competition law was most recently articulated in In re Tobacco II Cases (May 18, 2009, S147345) ___ Cal.4th ___ [2009 Cal. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 10:40 am by Venkat
Facebook and In re Facebook Privacy Litigation and notes that the fact that Gaos has standing is distinct from whether she has stated a claim.) [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
"  But 1-800 didn't do that, and I imagine deliberately so.When you purposefully create an ambiguity -- saying "Washington law applies, except maybe it doesn't" -- in situations in which clarity is easy, I think a reasonable interpretation is that you're trying to have it both ways, and leave open the possibility that in a different case, you'd indeed be arguing that Washington law applies, even for franchisees in California. [read post]
23 May 2017, 6:38 am by Chris Castle
Department of Justice re-interpreting the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees to require 100% licensing and prohibiting partial withdrawal. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
., In re Smith (Bankr CD Cal 1989) 105 BR 50, 51 n2 (estimating more than 30,000 such cases annually in Central District of California)]; and it succeeds because of the Bankruptcy Code's all-encompassing automatic-stay provision. [read post]