Search for: "In re AS" Results 2081 - 2100 of 369,265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2006, 6:06 pm
ON CNN, they're noting that the Dems seem to be doing better with conservative candidates, and noting the similarity between the views of Casey and Santorum on many social issues. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 1:57 pm
YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO CALL THEM "NEW YORK MONEY PEOPLE:" Complaining to the Justice Department about the "Jewish Lobby. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:55 pm by Kashmir Hill
If you’re not booting up your laptop or iPad during voir dire, you’re not a very good lawyer. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 5:00 am by Melinda Deel
MCL 710.45(7) & (8); In re Cotton, 208 Mich App 180, 185-187 (1994). [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 10:26 am
This must, of course, be right, although it is easy to see why Re G was misinterpreted. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 3:32 am by Liz Dunshee
Yesterday, the SEC announced this 98-page release to re-propose amendments to Reg M that would remove the references to credit rating agencies from existing exceptions provided in Rule 101 and Rule 102. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 3:07 pm
The Re Tweek: A selection of last week's notable tweets   Shared: Kill the Billable Hour? [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:39 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Orders for expungement — Vacated orders The issue before us in this consolidated appeal is whether the Circuit Court for Baltimore City committed reversible error when it sua sponte vacated orders for expungement it had previously issued for each of the four appellants, Dominic H., Joseph D., Walter M., and Anthony C. ... [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
Informed by public comment, and in light of current markets, we have updated and re-proposed these amendments. [read post]
1 May 2010, 9:58 am by Christian Stegmaier
Interesting article in Slate re: the concept of "social license" http://ping.fm/yYYtG [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Worth a read - especially when you're avoiding [insert your class subject here]. [read post]
While the manner in which the combined drugs achieved the reduction in blood pressure was unforeseen, the Board correctly determined that because the combined drugs yielded the same ultimate outcome as the individual compounds—lowering blood pressure in patients—the novel treatment was not patentable (In re Couvaras, June 14, 2023, Lourie, A.). [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 7:00 pm
In a case that may become increasingly important as the market crisis continues, the Southern District of New York in In re: American Express Co. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 12:35 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Recognition and Res Judicata of US Class Action Judgments in European Legal Systems Andrea Pinna (Erasmus University Rotterdam) has posted “Recognition and Res... [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:21 am by omnizant.support
Moving to a new home, even when you’re excited at the prospect, is accompanied by a good deal of stress, especially when you’re an older person. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 3:18 pm by John G. Balestriere
But once you’re actually fighting for a client, you’re supposed to do what’s best for the client, not focus on the fee. [read post]