Search for: "JOHNSON v. THE STATE" Results 2081 - 2100 of 8,029
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2018, 10:32 am by Ad Law Defense
Johnson and Nathan Archibald     As we blogged about recently, Defendants in the blockbuster Prop 65 case, Council for Education and Research on Toxics v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 6:47 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge Manion, dissenting in part, agreed with the lower court that the “things each plaintiff heard were too isolated, indirect, and sporadic to be actionable” (Johnson v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d at 65) Because SAi claims that “[b]ut for Furgang’s2 departure from the ordinary standards of professional conduct, SAi would … have [saved] more than $300,000 in legal fees”, SAi states that “‘but for’ [F&A’s] negligence[,] [SAi] … would not have sustained ‘actual and ascertainable’ damages. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:38 am by INFORRM
With so many journalists still in the cabinet (Boris Johnson, Michael Gove, Chris Grayling, Esther McVey), and PPE graduate Matt Hancock as Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, the instinct to work only to a deadline appears to remain strong, notwithstanding the change of Prime Minister. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
But in California, the state’s highest court enforced a surrogacy agreement in 1993, in Johnson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:19 pm by Amanda Pickens Nitto
May 31, 2018) (purported collective action brought under the FLSA by “distributors” who delivered and stocked baked goods alleging defendant misclassified them as independent contractors and failed to pay overtime compensation) Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm by Anthony Gaughan
In 1776 he served as a delegate to the state constitutional convention, where he made a mark as a thoughtful and devoted public servant. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:15 am by Public Employment Law Press
Distinguishing between an individual's "domicile" and his or her "residence"Campaniello v New York State Div. of Tax Appeals Trib., 2018 NY Slip Op 03400, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentFrom time to time an applicant for public employment or an employee is required to be "domiciled"* with the physical jurisdiction of the employer. [read post]