Search for: "LJ"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 2,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm
(WHDA) Freescale Semiconductor Inc – ITC institutes investigation (337-TA-786) regarding Certain Integrated Circuits (ITC Law Blog) Honeywell International – ALJ Gildea sets target date in Certain GPS Navigation Products (337-TA-783) (ITC Law Blog) Intellectual Ventures – Intellectual Ventures files new 337 complaint regarding Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory and NAND Flash Memory Devices (ITC Law Blog) Intellectual Ventures – Intellectual Ventures sues HP, others in W D… [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 12:49 pm
In Tom's latest work on punitive damages, which is forthcoming in Yale LJ, and is available in draft form on SSRN now, he argues that this would and should be an available option (constitutionally speaking) so long as state legislatures or courts said they were not engaged in awarding "punitive damages," which is to say, so long as language of condemnation or language of punishment is not explicitly used. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 4:39 pm
Court of Appeal The Court of Appeal (Dame Victoria Sharp P, Sir Geoffrey Vos C and Davis LJ) ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599) unanimously allowed Mr Lloyd’s appeal on all three grounds, granting him permission to serve out. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
It effectively raised the issue of oppression: The body of law upon which the argument is founded includes those cases raising the issue of "oppression": see, for example, Southwark L.B.C. v Sarfo (2000) 32 HLR 602 (where Roch LJ said, at 609, that "oppression may be very difficult if not impossible to define, but it is not difficult to recognise"); London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Murray J) Millett v Corbyn, heard 16 March 2021 (Vos MR, Sharp P, Warby LJ). [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am
The case of Thornton v Telegraph Group has been listed before Sedley LJ for argument on 14 October 2010 to deal with various issues, including costs. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm
29 and 30 June 2017 (Rafferty LJ and Popplewell J). [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:59 am
However, at this jurisdictional stage of the assessment of Millgate’s application, the Supreme Court found that contrary to the analysis of Sales LJ in the Court of Appeal, Millgate’s conduct is not relevant. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 1:49 am
Although in the event Munby LJ in did not grant anonymity to the treating clinicians, he did say this in his judgment ([2010] EWHC 538 (Fam)): ‘there is a significant and important wider public interest in protecting the anonymity of treating clinicians in child protection cases in order to promote the effective working of the child protection system; if treating clinicians are publicly ‘named and shamed’ and subjected to vilification for merely doing their jobs properly,… [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
” The case was originally heard on 8 February 2012 by Gross LJ and Irwin J. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
On 13 and 14 November 2019 the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in the most important defamation case if the year – Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm
The Leveson Inquiry The view that has emerged over the last few months that Leveson LJ may recommend that a new press regulator has an adjudicative function (such as the proposed Media Standards Authority) was obviously considered in the course of the project. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
It effectively raised the issue of oppression: The body of law upon which the argument is founded includes those cases raising the issue of "oppression": see, for example, Southwark L.B.C. v Sarfo (2000) 32 HLR 602 (where Roch LJ said, at 609, that "oppression may be very difficult if not impossible to define, but it is not difficult to recognise"); London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
On Monday 28 and Tuesday 29 November 2011 the Court of Appeal (Lord Judge LCJ, Lord Neuberger MR and Maurice Kay LJ) heard the appeals in Phillips v NGN and Coogan v NGN against orders of Mr Justice Vos in phone hacking claims (see [2011] EWHC 349 (Ch)). [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
The Court of Appeal similarly accepted the evidence noting that there had been no application to challenge the evidence of the Secretary of State: see [2013] EWCA Civ 199 at [70] (per Arden LJ). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am
In a unanimous decision ([2012] UKSC 11) the Supreme Court today allowed the appeal of Times Newspapers Ltd against a decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) which had held that held that it could not rely on Reynolds qualified privilege. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
Last Week in the Courts In the case of Re Winch (Contra Mundum Injunction) [2021] EWHC 1328 (QB) Warby LJ granted an interim contra mundum injunction to project the identity of an informer. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm
In other Leveson news, and again reported by Inforrm, prominent Ministers of the government, including the Prime Minister, have been granted Core Participant status in the Inquiry, despite Leveson LJ rejecting the application by the Government itself. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm
29 and 30 June 2017 (Rafferty LJ and Popplewell J). [read post]
