Search for: "Land v. People" Results 2081 - 2100 of 4,712
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2015, 9:28 am by Paul D. Knothe
Maryland and California’s Pitchess statutes in the wake of the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:35 am by Harold O'Grady
Labunski (Call #KF4555.L33 2000) which looks at Article V of the U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 11:41 pm by Tessa Shepperson
  It should not be necessary to have more than four names as only four people can hold a legal estate in land. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
The officers drove past Washington Park, where a crowd of people were drinking and shooting off fireworks. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 1:22 pm by Ilya Somin
Some people object to the presence of guns on their land for aesthetic or moral reasons (e.g. because they are staunch adherents of a philosophy of nonviolence). [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm by Jonathan Bailey
In February 2018, something happened that very few people outside of legal circles noticed. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 12:28 pm
Nounna and Beverage Concepts, Inc. over a similar type of relaxation beverage using the name MELLOW (pictured below) (pending trademark application here) that Beverage Concepts is apparently launching soon.CityCenter Land, LLC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 4:38 pm by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
Rather, it is an organization run by Methodists that owns all of the land in Ocean Grove, New Jersey, most of which is used for homes, stores, restaurants, hotels, and beach boardwalks. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County of Contra Costa (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 1464, 1466, 1468; SOCWA, supra, 196 Cal.App.4th at 1608, 1613, 1614, 1616; Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
  They are the co-authors of Secular Government, Religious People (forthcoming, Eerdmans Publishing Co., July 2014). [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 10:32 am by Joe Patrice
Cooley’s sudden, overnight removal of its “board approved DEI plan” from its public facing landing page gives me pause. [read post]