Search for: "Light v. United States" Results 2081 - 2100 of 11,294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Even relatively early on in his judgment at para 30 Lord Carnwath adopted an unsympathetic tone in relation to the accused terrorist’s case by letting it be known that citing the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Kuric v Slovenia (2013) 56 EHRR 20 (relied on by the intervening Open Society Justice Initiative) threw no light on the issues because it was not concerned with statelessness within the meaning of the 1954 Convention. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 11:08 am
Individual rather than the court responsible for identifying the "cause of action"Zimmer v Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket #08-1590, October 22, 2008 [not precedential]Lawrence Zimmer appealed an order by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, that dismissed his employment discrimination complaint "for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28… [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:04 am by Todd M. Nosher
We previously reported on developments in various United States Courts of Appeal decisions concerning reverse payments in Hatch-Waxman litigation settlements - that is, payments made by branded pharmaceutical patent holders to generic challengers to postpone market entry of the generic product. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:33 am by Sean Kirby
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in the matter of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:40 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Despite the Supreme Court making the Guidelines advisory in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:49 pm
Viewed in a light most favorable to the government, the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to find Naranjo intended to operate a fraudulent scheme. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 3:32 pm
In light of the Defendants manifest health issues (the Defendant was a transgendered individual, infected with HIV), the Court entered another Order directing the United States Marshals Service and its contractors to evaluate specified medical problems reported by the Defendant and his lawyer and then to provide care and treatment consistent with the standard of care for the conditions revealed by the ordered examination.Two weeks after the Defendant was remanded to the… [read post]