Search for: "Little v State"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 26,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2019, 1:38 pm
See this post.Despite history and widespread usage of "manner of execution" and "method of execution" as synonymous, Judge Chutkan decided that "manner" includes all the details of the state's procedure, down to such things as catheter insertion.If upheld, that would be a neat little Catch-22 preventing enforcement of the federal death penalty in many states. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:04 pm
(Randy Barnett) Last Friday, I attended the oral argument in the Seven-Sky v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 12:34 pm
In Murthy v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
In April, the state of Nevada filed an amicus brief that I coauthored on behalf of Nevada itself and eight other state governments in Murr v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm
Circuit heard oral argument in Doe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:00 am
State and James Bigby v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 4:48 am
Click here to read this decision, Slayton v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Mr Whitehouse formed a company in 2011, BMWAssociates, for his “little one-man band telecom railway company”. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:02 am
Also, see Contract Services Employee Trust v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:34 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:38 am
In Rojas-Cifuentes v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
First, this seems to be little more than a stopgap measure. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:44 am
Essentially, the court restated old law that states an abstract idea is not patentable. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
See Mohr v. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 5:45 am
In most states, jury selection takes a couple of hours. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm
Boiled down a little, Section 1983 states that anyone who deprives another of his or her Constitutionally-protected rights “under the law” is liable for damages done to the injured party. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
Case citation: King v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 11:23 pm
What happens next procedurally is a little unclear, and substantively, things are even murkier. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm
London Borough of Hackney v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of an appeal on the issues raised in Forcelux v Binnie [2009] EWCA Civ 854 [Our report here], specifically the Court’s ability to set aside a possession order under CPR 3.1(2)(m) as opposed to the more restrictive provisions in CPR 39.3. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm
London Borough of Hackney v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of an appeal on the issues raised in Forcelux v Binnie [2009] EWCA Civ 854 [Our report here], specifically the Court’s ability to set aside a possession order under CPR 3.1(2)(m) as opposed to the more restrictive provisions in CPR 39.3. [read post]
