Search for: "MATTER OF D S N" Results 2081 - 2100 of 5,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Ryan Amelio
”[20] OSHA in the 1991 Standard relied on its reasoning from the 1978 Occupational Exposure to Lead Final Standard (the “1978 Standard”) where it rejected biological testing of workers as a means of monitoring employer compliance with occupational lead exposure limits.[21] In the 1978 Standard, OSHA concluded that “[a]ttempting to compel workers to subject themselves to detailed medical examinations presents the possibility of clashes with legitimate privacy and religious… [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
They spoke of fédéralisme rentable—profitable federalism. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| 'Guns ‘N’ Rosé' Beer: Sounds Familiar? [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 11:47 am
 ODC filed formal charges against Respondent on March 13, 2013, alleging violation of the following Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR: Rule 1.15 (safekeeping property); Rule 4.1 (truthfulness in statements to others); Rule 8.4(b) (criminal act that reflects adversely on lawyer's honesty); Rule 8.4(d) (conduct involving dishonesty); and Rule 8.4(e) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice). [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 5:30 am by Ralf Michaels
An analysis of the publicly available documents seems to suggest that Belgian courts would indeed apply the CISG to the APA if a claim was brought.[17] Some of the consequences of the CISG’s application The question one might ask now is: does it matter at all whether the CISG is applicable? [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 10:24 am
How'd he get into this mess, and what's his future with the firm? [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Adam Schiff (D-CA)’s "good" draft for an ISIS AUMF. [read post]
20 May 2013, 11:55 pm by Daniel Richardson
”  Since “[n]othing in defendant’s motion to dismiss or the record before the trial court raised any factual dispute or suggestion that the delays . . . were attributable to any cause other than routine pretrial proceedings, or that the State had failed to prosecute the matter with diligence,” the 560-day delay was not “presumptively prejudicial. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 2:05 pm by Jeff Welty
Rather, it is commonly held that this gap can be filled merely on the basis of the affiant-officer’s experience (or, for that matter, the magistrate’s common-sense judgment) that drug dealers ordinarily keep their supply, records, and monetary profits at home. [read post]
” Co-sponsor of the bill Mario Díaz-Balart said that “[i]n contrast to the weak and confused policy of the Biden Administration, the House is standing solidly with Israel as it wages an existential battle against the terrorist state of Iran, and its terrorist proxies. [read post]