Search for: "MATTER OF K A B"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 2,720
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2011, 11:00 am
After a hearing, the district court took the matter under advisement. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
As a matter of fact, a colleague of the then representative has ordered a bank in Munich to transfer the amount due for the renewal fee for the third year plus additional fee (altogether 418 €) to the German bank account of the EPO more than five weeks before the expiry of the time limit. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:00 pm
§§ 379h(d)(1), 379h(k), 379h(a)(1)(F)-(G). [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 12:01 pm
Therefore, the board is satisfied that the technical problem posed is solved by the claimed subject-matter. [3.8] It remains to be decided whether the claimed solution is obvious having regard to the prior art. [3.8.1] In the blood processing system and method according to D1, the mononuclear cells are accumulated behind a barrier and, once a sufficient volume of the mononuclear cells has accumulated, they are caused to spill over the barrier into a collection well […]. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:49 am
Just after the one-year period to file a complaint under the WGCA, Appellees filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction pursuant to Wyoming Rule of Civil Procedure (12)(b)(1). [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
This principle excludes the patent monopoly from being extended to subject-matter, [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
It is to be emphasized in this respect that, according to the principle of party disposition (A113(2)), it is the applicant’s or patentee’s responsibility to define the subject-matter of the application or the patent. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
As an auxiliary measure, it was requested that the following question be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA): a) If an authorisation is filed by facsimile, does the facsimile represent a copy in accordance with the Decision of the President [of the EPO dated 12 July 2007 on the filing of authorisations (OJ Special Edition 3/2007, L1, page 128)];b) If yes, is the EPO obliged in accordance with the Decision to inform the representative that an authorisation has not been… [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 10:26 am
My friend Anupam has been reading the Google 10-K and finds nuance in the notion of "public" company: Our Class B common stock has 10 votes per share and our Class A common stock has one vote per share. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
As the time limit pursuant to R 159(1) EPC expired in the present case on 23 July 2008, the DA was validly filed on 22 July 2008.[4] The reasons in the appealed decision are mainly based on the grounds that:(a) the term “pending earlier European patent application” in R 36(1) EPC includes the requirement that the parent application must be pending before the EPO; and(b) an international application which has not fulfilled the requirements of R 159(1) EPC for entering the… [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 11:01 am
Claim 1 of the patent as granted read:A process for making a viscous reaction product and making this into a solid component, comprising the steps of: a) reacting at least two compounds with one another to form a first active material to form a viscous mixed product which has a viscosity of at least 500cps or even at least 1000cps at 20°C, and mixing this with a second active material that is a perfume mix; b) mixing the product of step a) with a liquid carrier material, whereby step… [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:38 pm
(a) In General- Section 48102(a) is amended– (1) in the matter before paragraph (1) by striking `of this title’ and inserting `of this title and, for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2014, under subsection (g)’; (2) in paragraph (11)– (A) in subparagraph (K) by inserting `and’ at the end; and (B) in subparagraph (L) by striking `and’ at the end; (3) in paragraph… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:25 am
§ 201(b). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 4:25 am
What matters to practice is not what the law "is" but what the "perception" of the law is. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
E=22.9) with respect to the colorations obtained with comparative compositions B (? [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
ICBC, 2002 BCSC 341; k. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:35 am
Sundby & Lucy B. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
Last week, the Supreme Court delivered two such rulings within a matter of days. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
The situation referred to at point [4.2] above applies to this claim in that it includes additional features which were not part of the claims as originally filed and which give rise to the question of whether or not an additional search as provided for in the Guidelines, B-II 4.2(i) and C-VI, 5.2(ii) and 8.2, is required in order to be able to examine the question of whether or not the claimed subject-matter meets the requirements of the EPC, in particular A 52(1) in combination… [read post]
