Search for: "MILLER v. U.S." Results 2081 - 2100 of 2,557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In such agreements – known alternatively as Coblentz, Damron, or Miller-Shugart agreements – the defendant directors and officers assign the plaintiffs any claims they may ha [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:51 am by The Charge
Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), the Court declared that, absent a direct relationship between a restricted firearm and its necessity to a well-regulated militia, laws related to firearms did not violate the Second Amendment. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:23 pm by SOIssues
Circuit Court of Appeals would even need to hear oral arguments in the case of Miller, et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 3:44 am by SHG
Given these policy concerns, we see no reason to revisit the Miller rule in this case. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Indiana, 414 U.S. 105, 109 (1973) (emphasis added); see also Brandenburg v. [read post]