Search for: "Majors v. Majors" Results 2081 - 2100 of 55,297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2007, 1:00 pm
Because the issue was not before them neither the majority opinion nor the dissent mentioned Sutton v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:24 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Dana Peterson, Brandon McKelvey, and Sophia Kwan  Today, the California Supreme Court issued a lengthy opinion in its long-awaited “meal and rest break" case, Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 6:31 pm by Anderson Franco Law
The collision involved at least four vehicles, including a blue Honda CR-V, a red Toyota Prius, and a gray Toyota Corolla. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Ashutosh Avinash Bhagwat (University of California, Davis - School of Law) has posted Sorrell v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 6:42 am by WIMS
Greenpeace USA argues that the action is not justiciable, that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to issue its order, and that the court erred in its application of Winter v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:23 am by Eric Goldman
Wagner is circling back to the same topic, less than 2 years after enacting a major new federal crime, raises some questions. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:53 pm
Despite a vigorous dissent by the Chief Justice, the majority in CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:23 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In this post, we summarize a portion of the majority judgement.Case:                          AT & T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:06 am
Supreme Court, in revisiting the issue in the case of Kimble v Marvel Entertainment, LLC (as reported by AmeriKat on June 30th), would provide some clarity. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:45 pm
Both the majority opinion, and  a separate opinion of two Justices whose votes were necessary to make the majority, provide a formula  at least for narrowing the impact of the ruling in Giles v. [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 4:52 am by jonathanturley
On Friday, the Supreme Court agreed to review a potentially blockbuster religion clause case in Oklahoma Charter School Board v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:44 am by Stephen Kirkpatrick and Thomas Morgan
This concerned a contractual dispute between Vitol, a major oil trader, and Beta Renowable Group, a manufacturer of biofuel products. [read post]