Search for: "Majors v. Smith" Results 2081 - 2100 of 2,978
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
  Each of the three major players in the peer-to-peer ride-sharing economy, Uber, Lyft and Sidecar, offer $1,000,000 in liability coverage.[18]  However, the coverage for each company is limited to the times between picking up and dropping off of a passenger.[19]  Coverage does not extend to the period during which a driver logs into an application but has yet to procure a passenger. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
  The Court may be holding it for Smith v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
  The Court may be holding it for Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Smith that the free exercise clause generally requires no religious exemptions from laws that are neutral and generally applicable. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
” In their analysis, Justice Abella and Rowe, writing for the majority, found that Ontario’s Arbitration Act would be applicable. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
On 13 July 2011 Stanley Burnton and Aikens LLJ refused the claimant permission to appeal in the case of Smith -v- ADVFN Plc & Ors. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Halliburton Co. green-lighted securities class-action suits the business community had hoped to stop, and in Smith v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 15 July 2016, Green J handed down judgment in the case of Smith v Unknown Defendant [2016] EWHC 1775 (QB). [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
IPSO There was a post of the IPSO’s blog “IPSO Blog: Reporting on terrorism and IPSO advice on major incidents”. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
Randy Smith accusing the panel's majority of writing new law saying "We have never held that an actress' performance could be copyrightable". [read post]