Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 19,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2024, 5:28 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
The image of row after row of plain white crosses marking the overseas graves of soldiers was emblazoned on the minds of Americans at home. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:19 am
A & M Wings, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 2:58 am
Garan Incorporated v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
" Stone Lion Capital Partners v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
United States, marking the second time the Pennsylvania woman will appear before that tribunal. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:00 pm
Corp. v Huang, 94 AD2d 176, 180 [internal quotation marks omitted]).Accordingly, the AD2 reversed the underlying determination, and dismissed the causes of action in question.Was that a toothless agreement? [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Nyazee, The Probable Islamic State of the Future, (October 21, 2023).Mark Satta, 303 Creative v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:57 am
Co., 553 F.3d 447, 450 (6th Cir. 2009) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:46 am
The TTAB heard oral argument on April 24th in Dave Brock v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:39 am
See FTC v. 1-800 Contacts. * Cedar Valley Exteriors, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
In support of this opposition, eBay cites Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., 506 F3d 1165 (9th Cir., Nove. 5, 2007) where the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stated that the term "BAY" was the dominant portion of the eBay mark. [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:55 am
a SL [2011] EWCA Civ 618; [2011] WLR (D) 173 “A person threatened another with proceedings for infringement of a registered trade mark within section 21 of the Trade Marks Act 1994 if he stated or implied that he would bring a claim if the other did not agree to the terms he proposed. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:59 am
Ideation Unlimited, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:59 am
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 1465 The Court unanimously dismissed the appeal regarding a claim against trade mark infringement and passing off. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:37 am
Because the Regulation merely limited the "use" of trade marks they did not strip away the trade mark owner;s right to prevent or exclude others from using their mark (citing Arnold J in Pinterest v Premium Interest). [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:48 am
Yesterday marked a frustrating juncture in EFF’s long-running lawsuit against mass surveillance, Jewel v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 3:45 pm
This case, First Unitarian Church v. [read post]
