Search for: "Matter of Kennedy"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 4,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2009, 1:30 pm
As a matter of statutory interpretation, Justices Ginsburg, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, and Thomas, held that the federal court has jurisdiction to compel arbitration only if it would have jurisdiction to resolve the underlying dispute between the parties, looking at the type of claims asserted in the original complaint. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:11 pm
Twitter: @collabtools Listen to The Kennedy-Mighell Report podcast on Legal Talk Network. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 11:03 am
" My guess is that under the current composition of the Court, Kennedy would join the liberals and strike down this law, but predicting the outcome of cases is a very risky business. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:21 am
As the senior justice in the majority, Kennedy gave the job of writing the decision to Kagan, a major assignment for a relatively junior justice. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:33 pm
It is the criminal justice system," Kennedy said. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:41 pm
(For that matter, I think the dissenters probably would agree with that statement.) [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:55 pm
Kennedy based her decision on well-settled, albeit 20th Century, California law which lays out a broad array of considerations to help distinguish between employees and contractors. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:56 pm
And:We have served three presidents as pardon attorney, and have strong opinions about the importance of presidential leadership in pardon matters. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 2:20 pm
It's hardly possible that Kennedy and his co-concurrers, or any sentient being, for that matter, actually hold that opinion. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:05 pm
Those murders mattered. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 8:50 am
Justices Kennedy and French dissented. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:44 pm
On this quantum issue Kennedy LJ agreed with him (at p 1429) and Schiemann LJ (at p 1447) expressed no opinion. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:34 pm
Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas vigorously dissented. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 7:00 am
(Kennedy v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 1:23 pm
Matter of Eli H. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 3:23 pm
Justice Kennedy (joined by Justice Alito) issued a concurring opinion in which he indicated that "[t]here is no latitude for us to reach a different result. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Kennedy, who wrote the new 6-to-3 decision. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:04 am
After constant grilling from several Justices, Justice Kennedy finally summarized the Government’s position in a question where his tone was certainly revealing: “your position that no matter how unreasonable the plaintiff has been, no matter how costly it’s been, no matter how long it’s taken, that you cannot award fees unless … the case is dismissed, and the judge says you’re barred from bringing this claim in this… [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:27 am
But perhaps most critically for the family, Justice Anthony Kennedy seemed to be a tough sell. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 9:09 am
According to Kennedy: The case is presented to us as if disgorgement is this category we must adopt. [read post]
