Search for: "Michigan v. Long" Results 2081 - 2100 of 2,476
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2010, 12:04 pm
In this instance, the Appellate Court said that the Commission could find it compensable as long as the actions were reasonably foreseeable.Past “Good Samaritan” cases have awarded compensation for a traveling employee killed while helping a stranded motorist while driving on a service call (Ace Pest Control, 1965) and in the case of a Chicago harbor master who jumped in to save someone from drowning in Lake Michigan (Metropolitan Water Dist., 1995). [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 12:04 pm
In this instance, the Appellate Court said that the Commission could find it compensable as long as the actions were reasonably foreseeable.Past “Good Samaritan” cases have awarded compensation for a traveling employee killed while helping a stranded motorist while driving on a service call (Ace Pest Control, 1965) and in the case of a Chicago harbor master who jumped in to save someone from drowning in Lake Michigan (Metropolitan Water Dist., 1995). [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:58 am by Michael Scutt
I can almost understand where they're coming from in Michigan, if the state really has to interfere in private citizens' lives at least do it properly. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Judge Friedman’s 25-page decision indicates that he found merit in IDA’s argument that the BLM’s practice of stockpiling tens of thousands of horses in long-term holding facilities in the Midwest is not authorized by law, and invited both parties to expedite [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
Judge Friedman’s 25-page decision indicates that he found merit in IDA’s argument that the BLM’s practice of stockpiling tens of thousands of horses in long-term holding facilities in the Midwest is not authorized by law, and invited both parties to expedit [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 4:04 pm by John W. Arden
Supreme Court's ruling, in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc, v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:25 am by Adam Chandler
Loree, Jr. offers a detailed analysis of the oral argument in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:23 am by gheriot
   As the University of Michigan admitted and the Supreme Court implicitly acknowledged in Grutter v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am by Ray Mullman
  That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm by John Steele
Louisiana, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, overturned the presumption announced in Michigan v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 5:27 am
In cleaning up some old files, I ran across the text of a speech I gave back in 2004 at Syracuse law school on the business judgment rule. [read post]