Search for: "People v. LAS"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 2,393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2009, 9:34 am
Less than a year later, the California Supreme Court struck down the state's death penalty in People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
We don't mind people saying we're full of it, we couldn't be litigators if we did, but that should be decided on the strength of our arguments, not on which side of the "v" we reside. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:34 am
As she is explaining that she wants to avoid any misunderstanding (a la WLW?) [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 5:45 am
In March 1983, Ronald Reagan was president, the last episode of "M*A*S*H" had just aired, the "moonwalk" was performed for the first time (the one by Michael Jackson, not Neil Armstrong), and the big hit at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas was Commodore's first portable computer, which offered buyers a full 64 kilobytes of RAM and a five-inch screen for only $995.00.Also, Ayers v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:03 pm
This measure did more than Supreme Court rulings, like Brown v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
(International Law Office) United States US Patents – Decisions BPAI: Merely outputting from a computer suffices under Bilski: Ex parte Dickerson (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright How many people have been sued in recording industry’s legal war on file-sharing? [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 5:25 am
Palmer, 2009 La. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 5:55 am
People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
Stupak v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
LEXIS 1073 (La. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
The Indiana Secretary of State filed a complaint against Aaron V. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:30 am
“Such tragedies can be avoided or reduced if governments adopt disaster risk reduction strategies aimed at protecting people’s health. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
Generally though, this makes it very hard for people to tell consumers that their products are like trade marked products in some respect.]IPKat concluding commentIf Intel was the low point of Art.5(2) protection for trade mark owners then this has got to be the high point, particularly when taken in conjunction with the approach to comparative advertising. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 11:00 pm
Morgan Creek Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
See Mauldin v. [read post]
