Search for: "Rogers v. Rogers" Results 2081 - 2100 of 4,928
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 8:35 am
This Comment argues that Congress should amend Section 114(b) of the Copyright Act to make clear that a de minimis defense is permitted for digital music sampling pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in VMG Salsoul, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
This Comment argues that Congress should amend Section 114(b) of the Copyright Act to make clear that a de minimis defense is permitted for digital music sampling pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in VMG Salsoul, LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Haley Proctor
Judge Katsas (joined by Judges Randolph and Rogers) succinctly captures the standing analysis with an analogy: In Optimal Wireless v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Haley Proctor
Judge Katsas (joined by Judges Randolph and Rogers) succinctly captures the standing analysis with an analogy: In Optimal Wireless v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:41 am by David Orentlicher
Judge Roger Vinson wondered whether Congress could require people to buy GM cars to protect the government's ownership stake in the company. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:17 am by James Bickford
The editorial board of the Miami Herald applauds last week’s decision in Thompson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 2:50 am by Walter Olson
Circuit Calls Out NLRB in Ruling on Union Access to Employer Property” [Minal Khan, Barnes & Thornburg, John Doran, Sherman & Howard (“epic benchslap”), on Janice Rogers Brown opinion in Fred Meyer Stores v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:54 am by Kali Borkoski
District Judge Roger Vinson suggested that “[i]t would be a giant leap for the Supreme Court to say that a decision to buy or not to buy is tantamount to activity. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:16 am by Kiera Flynn
In Frederick, Maryland, a museum exhibit on slavery has been created in the home of former Chief Justice Roger B. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 2:27 pm
Jackson has this column in today's Boston Globe on the Massachusetts v. [read post]