Search for: "Ruth, Appeal of" Results 2081 - 2100 of 2,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2018, 11:33 am by Jennifer Chacon
  He also maintained that, even if the Supreme Court were to find ambiguity, deference to the Board of Immigration Appeals’ interpretation of the provision was not required in this case. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 9:25 am by Jim Rossi
The clear lines of field preemption have had some appeal among the Justices in recent terms, even beyond rule-bound formalists such as Justice Scalia. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron and Laura Dooley
(In this regard, Barrett is a worthy successor to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, another civil procedure professor who viewed International Shoe as dispositive in this area.)What now? [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The Washington Post’s Ruth Marcus is one such commentator. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, in 1868, Congress passed a law stripping the Supreme Court of its jurisdiction to hear an already-pending appeal in a habeas corpus case brought by a Mississippi critic of Reconstruction. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am by Michele Goodwin
Both justices were appointed in the same year to federal circuit courts of appeals in 1980 by President Jimmy Carter. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am by Rory Little
Seeming agreement that the Sixth Amendment does not apply – but perhaps its “test” does At yesterday’s oral argument, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, followed by Justice Elena Kagan, quickly established that Betterman is not demanding that the criminal case against him (to which he pled guilty) should be dismissed. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 5:19 pm
  No member of the Court publicly opposed the idea, although Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg — who had voted earlier to uphold the $79.5 million verdict — seemed a bit hesitant. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:34 am by Amy Howe
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg interrupted Francisco, suggesting that federal immigration laws only allow the president to “suspend” the entry of travelers into the United States as a temporary remedy, to give Congress time to pass laws to address any problems. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:26 am by Amy Howe
In a decision joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, Roberts characterized the case as involving two, potentially conflicting lines of the Supreme Court’s precedent. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:29 am
The appeal, brought by two men on Kentucky's death row, Ralph Baze and Thomas C. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm by legalinformatics
Lempert (University of Michigan), Kwangbai Park (Chungbuk National University), Christoph Rennig (Frankfurt High Court of Appeals): Roundtable–The Role of Professionals in Lay Tribunals Soren Frederiksen (York University): Has the Supreme Court’s Philosophy of Science Made It to Canada? [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:34 am by Lyle Denniston
Breyer wrote for the dissenters, including Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:37 pm by Jennifer Chacon
She pointed to precedent from the Board of Immigration Appeals indicating that 48 hours would be too long and advocated that the appropriate time frame would be within a day of release. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 12:43 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
The majority of the articles have been solicited from prominent academics and practitioners in the field of international criminal law and feminist jurisprudence, such as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Prof. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:48 am by Miriam Seifter
  In contrast, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s concurrence joined the majority opinion except for its reliance on the MOA, given the lack of briefing about the document and the government’s divergent construction of it. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:09 pm by Elie Mystal
Uninvited.Does Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg need to be portrayed by Tiny Fey before Harvard lets her speak at graduation? [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
  And in a case about police authority to interview a child about a sex abuse case, without a warrant and without parental consent, Justice Kagan ultimately ruled that the Court could not decide the case because it had become moot, but that did not keep her from creating — in what for all the world seemed like an advisory opinion – a completely unprecedented right of public officials to appeal lower court rulings on their legal immunity, even though they had won such a… [read post]