Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 2081 - 2100
of 6,068
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
The question concerned whether a sale of land could occur during the week of Christmas. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 3:18 pm
Postman Pat has been broadcast in more than 150 countries, including China, with book sales of 15 million.The IPKat notes that James Bond is being 'refreshed', in consequence of which, in Quantum of Solace, he will no longer be delivering his trademark (sic) line: "My name's Bond, ... [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
The General Court’s decision The General Court annulled the BoA’s decision. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:40 am
” * S&P Global Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
” Butler v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:28 am
The degree of recognition of the famous mark; v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 8:55 am
Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. v. [read post]
Louisiana Legislature Calls Itself Into Second Extraordinary Session and Includes Certain Tax Issues
30 Sep 2020, 8:46 am
The employer’s contribution is based on a rate that increases or decreases with the company’s experience with unemployment, i.e., how many of the company’s former employees claim unemployment benefits. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 2:09 am
" The Hearing Officer upheld the opposition and refused to register the mark on the basis of the absolute grounds for refusal set out in section 3(1)(c) and (d) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 ("the TMA"). [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
The foundational case is Lyus v Prowsa Developments [1982] 1 WLR 1044, but, as Lloyd LJ noted, there were three key points about that case: (a) Ms Lyus’ right didn’t bind the bank, which sold the property; (b) Ms Lyus’ right was specifically identified in the bank’s contract of sale; and (c) Ms Lyus could not have done any more to protect her right. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
The foundational case is Lyus v Prowsa Developments [1982] 1 WLR 1044, but, as Lloyd LJ noted, there were three key points about that case: (a) Ms Lyus’ right didn’t bind the bank, which sold the property; (b) Ms Lyus’ right was specifically identified in the bank’s contract of sale; and (c) Ms Lyus could not have done any more to protect her right. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
C. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
', discusses the EU agricultural industry and the reaction of EU research institutions over the consequence of the CJEU's ruling in Case C-528/16. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 12:53 am
Condux v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 2:31 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:10 am
Regency: Limited Partnerships and Fiduciary Duties Posted by Robert C. [read post]
23 May 2016, 5:10 am
Zauderer v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:08 am
William C. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:18 pm
Bayshore, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:09 am
April 17, 2015). 8th grader gets a C in a class and gets grounded. [read post]
