Search for: "Samuel, Appeal of" Results 2081 - 2100 of 3,327
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2007, 2:59 pm
As a trial lawyer that obviously appeals to me, and I watched as she took 17 different selection tips and matched them to posts. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:40 am by Moria Miller
Samuel Arsht Professor of Corporate Law, to receive the Harvey Levin Memorial Award for Excellence in Teaching. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:17 am by Scott Bomboy
In the majority opinion, Justice Samuel Miller recounted the entire history of West Virginia’s admission to the Union. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the city’s petition for review. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the city’s petition for review. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 7:17 am by Emily Vaisa
A unanimous three-judge panel of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the states have legal standing to proceed because they are employers who must comply with the rule. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:11 am
Justice Samuel Alito Jr. dissented from the denial of review, voicing concerns about the suppression of student expression. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:22 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Samuel Alito pressed Cole to better define “coercion. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:10 pm by Kevin Johnson
The Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed his appeal from the removal order. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:05 pm by Joel Goldstein
” Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, dissented, maintaining that the background rule the majority established is not based on the text of the safe berth clause. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 5:43 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Brett Kavanaugh responded to Kagan’s dissent with his own concurring opinion, which was joined by Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:25 pm by Steve Vladeck
Although Justice Samuel Alito pushed Hughes on whether he agreed with the Fourth Circuit that there is a “special circumstances” exception to the PLRA’s exhaustion requirement, Hughes pushed back, suggesting that although he believes the Fourth Circuit was correct, he also believed there was enough support in the record to affirm the court of appeals on the distinct ground that the unexhausted remedies were not in fact available to Blake. [read post]