Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 4,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2014, 5:45 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 2:17 pm
United States. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:11 am
United States. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:17 am
The Court asked the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States last fall. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:23 am
United States, two cases in which the Court recently granted review that could have potential implications for the intersection of criminal law and immigration. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:40 am
And I argued Baze v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 8:31 am
California and United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:00 pm
The Judicial Conference of the United States has adopted the Code of Conduct for United States Judges and has authorized its designated Committee on Codes of Conduct to issue advisory opinions on the meaning of the Code of Conduct. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:01 am
California and United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:29 am
Justice Scalia’s point is to chide the majority for concluding that one state might be responsible for eliminating all twenty-one units of pollution if that state can do it most economically. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:47 am
Although it did not come out really plainly in the argument, the Court did seem to sense that there were greater risks to cellphone privacy in the case of a modern smartphone — the kind of device involved in Riley — and a somewhat dated model, the “flip phone,” which is the device at issue in the second case Tuesday, United States v Wurie. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
This morning, I attended the Supreme Court arguments in the cell phone search cases, United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 2:08 pm
Once again we see that our right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure finds too few friends in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 3:00 pm
In the other case, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday of this week in Schuette v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm
Justices Scalia and Thomas stated that the question here, as in every case in which neutral state action is said to deny equal protection on account of race, is whether the challenged action reflects a racially discriminatory purpose. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
” Under United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 8:47 am
CTS shared its argument time with the United States supporting it as an amicus. [read post]
