Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 2081 - 2100 of 5,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The US Supreme Court decision — City of Los Angeles v Patel This opinion will be an interesting one for Constitutional Law students interested in Fourth Amendment search and seizure. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:45 pm by Kent Scheidegger
The Fourth Amendment binds executive officials, forbidding them from executing unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 5:45 am
Constitution prohibits unreasonable search and seizures. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
Justice Clark What happens when the police obtain evidence from an illegal search or seizure? [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:57 pm by Jennifer Granick
 [Do criminal defendants charged using evidence derived from back door searches get notice of those back door searches?] [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
After his conviction, Olmstead’s appeal made it to the Supreme Court on the grounds that the wiretapping act was a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights relating to unreasonable search and seizure In a 5-4 verdict, the Supreme Court decided on June 4, 1928 that the unapproved wiretapping was permissible. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 3:01 pm
The court agreed with this argument, but in order to bypass the search warrant requirement, the state also would need to establish that they did not have time to get a search warrant. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 11:54 am
The law requires that with only a few exceptions, law enforcement officers have to get a warrant before they can conduct a search and seizure upon a suspect. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:42 am
However, the 4th Amendment only protects against `governmental action; it is wholly inapplicable “to a search or seizure . . . effected by a private individual not acting as an agent of the Government. . . . [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:05 pm by HL Chronicle of Data Protection
The ruling is the latest of several to interpret the scope of the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures in the digital age. [read post]
28 May 2015, 5:09 am by John Floyd
  In June 2012, Sexton sought and secured a search warrant for material at a hotel room in Wooster, Ohio where Pirosko was staying. [read post]
27 May 2015, 5:28 am
Warrantless searches and seizures are per se unreasonable under the 4th Amendment subject to only a few exceptions. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:22 am
” While the search-and-seizure caselaw as such doesn’t preclude searches of homes (especially when police have a warrant based on probable cause), it does rest on broad privacy principles, to which the Alabama opinions seem to be appealing; and these principles may be especially potent given the California Constitution’s specific protection of the right to privacy. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am by Sean F. Leslie
The contraband alcohol was discovered as a result of an illegal search and seizure. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:19 pm
I discussed this problem in my 2005 article, Searches and Seizures in a Digital World. [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:18 pm
   Of course, that makes no logical sense—a court order is no guarantee that a search or seizure will be successful. [read post]
18 May 2015, 10:20 am
The trial judge denied a motion to exclude the evidence that argued that it was an unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:53 pm by William Weinberg
Some of the more common violations that police officers make, along with search and seizure violations, may include: entrapment, writing police reports with inaccurate or missing information, in an effort to persuade the District Attorney to file charges, misleading judges in order to obtain a search warrant and arresting individuals without probable cause. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:22 am
Thus, the Search Warrant arguably authorized the seizure of information that was not classified.Even if the Search Warrant did not authorize the seizure of non-classified information, items not specifically described in a search warrant may nevertheless be seized if they are `reasonably related’ to the offenses which form the basis for the search warrant. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:45 am by SHG
  Using a totality of the circumstances test, she holds that Riley provides the escape valve that allows her to suppress the search of the computer, even though the physical place of seizure was a border. [read post]