Search for: "State v House"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 28,759
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
In Dart v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 2:05 pm
Codifying the Michigan Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Rouch World v MI Department of Civil Rights, which held that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation constitutes a violation of ELCRA as currently written, the amendment makes Michigan the 24th state to incorporate provisions for safeguarding individuals based on sexual orientation. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 1:20 pm
Ohio law specifically states that a qualifying institution or organization is a charitable, educational, or state or political subdivision making a charitable use of its property; as determined in Chagrin Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 10:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 8:19 am
In Bartenwerfer v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:35 am
Arcadians for Environmental Preservation v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 7:10 am
Guiding each of the Court’s recent decisions is Myers v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am
One cluster of House Republicans, led by Reps. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
The Bush v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 11:47 am
This would be to under-state their involvement. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
EFF appealed the case before the state's transparency board, which eventually forced Escobedo to release a slideshow and receipts showing the city had wasted more than 4 million pesos on the Sistema de Predicción de Delitos (SPRED) project. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
The problem with vagueness was spelt out by the House of Lords in R v Rimmington, citing the US case of Grayned: "Vagueness offends several important values … A vague law impermissibly delegates basic policy matters to policemen, judges and juries for resolution on an ad hoc and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm
Ryan Reft, Library of Congress, has posted Gideon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
While the conference was held under the Chatham House Rule, several of the expert participants are taking part in a public question and answer series to illuminate some of the pressing issues addressed during the conference sessions that merit further analysis. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
See, e.g., Signal Cos. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
As part of this analysis, the appellate court also noted the limitations on denials under the Housing Accountability Act. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 6:16 pm
—Will Rogers 1Dominish v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:51 am
The usual consortium of conservative libertarians and civil liberties advocates who have historically opposed Section 702 is now joined by those in the House of Representatives who have expressed concerns regarding the “weaponization” of the federal government. [read post]
