Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2015, 12:01 am
It’s probably not a surprise that the Court has ruled (particularly in Iguarta-De La Rosa v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
This is especially so when the Court recently held that the Property Clerk's failure to commence a forfeiture action within the 25 day period, after a timely demand is made, fatal; as held in the case of Property Clerk, New York City Police Department v Smith, decided by the First Department in 2009; Property Clerk, New York City Police Department v Seroda, also decided by First Department in 1987. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 2:29 pm
On December 31, 2009, in a case of first impression, the Fourth Circuit held in Stone v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:21 am
Case Name: Motley v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:30 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Republic of Philippines v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:35 am
That the Court would consider reversing a key portion of its decision in McConnell v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 10:36 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
See First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:41 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its per curiam ruling in Washington v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Reed’s case to the 21st Judicial District Court in Bastrop County for an evidentiary hearing, which was held in July 2021. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 10:53 am
"So the first requirement is the recording of a First Information Report (FIR) about the incident. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:59 am
By Dennis Crouch Xitronix Corp. v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 12:12 pm
First, Article V, Subsection 11(c) states that "[t]he governor shall make the appointment within sixty days after the nominations have been certified to the governor. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:30 pm
Superior Court (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1355-1356 [59 Cal.Rptr.3d 363], quoting the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
At its Conference on January 9, 2015, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as state bans on same-sex marriage, proof of intent in a constructive discharge case, personal jurisdiction to award a no-contact order, and the presumption of judicial vindictiveness under North Carolina v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
The award must be confirmed by a state or federal court so that you can use judicial execution practice to collect on the award. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Johnson (2015), which led to thousands of new filings in the federal district courts and courts of appeals. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:45 am
In reaching its decision, the Court cited United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 10:56 pm
The Ninth Circuit did not explain how a decision from a non-judicial agency can conflict with a decision by the Court of Appeals for certification purposes. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:27 am
Howes v. [read post]
