Search for: "State v. Harris"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 5,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2015, 4:49 pm
State, No. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:20 am
Harris, the court said that “intrastate economic protectionism constitutes a legitimate state interest. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:44 am
Harris v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
Surveillance Privacy advocates are worried about the use of surveillance technology to track women seeking abortions in US states that have banned and restricted the procedure following the Supreme Court decision which overturned Roe v Wade. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am
Harris Associates and Merck v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 3:58 am
Porsche A.G. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:11 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 12:53 pm
See State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:40 am
Second, while some states have made the legislative choice to disallow mandatory agency fees (as they are free to do), others have entered into longstanding union contracts that include agency fee provisions; as Justice Kagan observed in her dissent in Harris v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 388, the Court may appropriately decline to mandate the order of decision that the lower courts must follow, see, e.g., Strickland v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 7:48 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
Hart v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 1:09 pm
Recently, on July 23, 2008, Judicial Hearing Officer Gerald Harris of the New York County Criminal Court attempted to answer this question in People v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 5:17 am
” Lyda Conley was the first Native American woman lawyer in the United States when she was admitted to the Missouri State Bar in 1902. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:39 am
While the justices pressed both sides, there was one sticking point for the government that many justices kept returning to: United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
Harris District Court. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:43 am
Porsche A.G. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 12:00 am
—Or, to put it more plainly, in spite of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 2:22 pm
Sentencing Commission, 2007 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics Tables Sentencing Memorandum in United States v. [read post]
