Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 4,683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Under the rule of law, the meaning of a law should not differ according to the identity of the decision-maker: Taub v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:12 pm
City of Irvine v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Texas to U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:56 am
As gay, lesbian, and other proponents of same-sex marriages celebrate the United States Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| Plant variety in Case C‑242/14 | US Supreme Court on spiderman patent | Hospira v Genentech saga | Are EU policy-makers fighting the right copyright battles? [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm
To determine whether a state actively supervises a state licensing board, a controlling number of the board’s decision-makers cannot currently participate in regulating the industry. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 4:39 am
Church & Dwight Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
The recent Supreme Court decision in Yukon Francophone School Board, Education Area #23 v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The standard the City urged for reviewing a facial challenge used language from United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm
Two of today's decisions involve a question about the proper decision maker in § 2254 habeas cases for the stay-and-abeyance procedure described in Rhines v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
’” And the court promised that it wasn’t insulating supplement makers from liability. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:22 pm
" Everything was going along fine until Marvel stumbled across Brulotte v Thys (1964). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:35 pm
Save Our Heritage Organization v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:15 am
Today’s opinion in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 3:05 am
The decision, in the case of Los Angeles v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 11:00 pm
The scale of data collection, data sharing and data analysis has not gone unnoticed to public policy makers and this has led to the inclusion of special rules addressing profiling in the Regulation. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
They are deal makers. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 11:55 am
Concepcion and American Express v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
While Westminster’s review decision had wrongly stated that Mr J was not homeless, it had also correctly stated that Eastbourne had and continued to have a housing duty to Mr J. [read post]
