Search for: "State v. Peters"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 5,036
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2014, 2:29 am
Says Peter: Want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am
Indeed, it is this relationship which gives rise to the duty imposed upon the doctor to properly treat his or her patient (see Bazakos v Lewis, 12 NY3d 631, 634; Payette v Rockefeller Univ., 220 AD2d 69, 72; Ellis v Peter, 211 AD2d 353; Heller v Peekskill Community Hosp., 198 AD2d 265; LoDico v Caputi, 129 AD2d 361, 363; see also Speigel v Goldfarb, 66 AD3d 873, 874). [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:48 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am
” Discussing Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
The Court concludes therefore that there is insufficient evidence to show general causation.Federal and State Courts have consistently determined that the cause or causes of MCS (IEI) cannot be reliably established by scientific proof (see, e.g., Oppenheimer v United Charities of NY, 266 AD2d 116, 698 NYS2d 144 [1st Dept 1999]; Frank v State of New York, 972 F Supp 130 [ND NY 1997]). [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:49 pm
In Hill v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 3:01 pm
" [AP; State Farm v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 3:05 am
For instance, I worked very hard behind the scenes in State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
State of Indiana Willie Eaton v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 7:56 pm
., Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 6:33 pm
Mid State Fire Equipment of Cent. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:44 am
Supreme Court’s 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 8:14 am
Both require more detailed blogging (which will happen over the weekend), but, to get started . . .Peter Goldberger provides this summary of United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 10:54 am
” Transmission Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 8:24 am
(United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am
Keegan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
The judge acknowledged that the parties might have their own goals when it comes to scheduling but stated that parties to such patent cases should regard themselves “as under a duty to inform the Court about of scheduling issues”. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 4:04 pm
(The title , which I have used in various forms before, recalls J Jonah Jameson, the irascible boss of Peter Parker aka SpiderMan whom JJJ of course famously detested. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
