Search for: "State v. Rowe"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 3,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2011, 10:10 am
” At issue in the case is whether a death-row inmate is barred from ever receiving federal habeas review of his constitutional claims when – through no fault of his own – his attorneys ceased acting as his representatives and missed the deadline to file his state post-conviction appeal. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 9:38 pm
LINKConcerned about the lack of qualified lawyers willing to represent indigent death-row inmates, the Utah Supreme Court warned Friday it might be forced to reverse capital sentences. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:20 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a trial court in the case of CA Death Row inmate Hector Ayala Wednesday. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:49 pm
Maples, a death row inmate in Alabama, without charge. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:01 am
United States, 11-883; Brito v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:09 am
Wainwright and Panetti v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:04 am
Missed last week, but leading off this edition, is Phillip Anthony Summers v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Last year, he argued before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Davis v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 1:32 pm
Supreme Court in Furman v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:39 am
Opponents of the death penalty in many other states, and in Congress, have been floating similar legislation since 1987, when the Supreme Court handed down an influential decision in a case known as McCleskey v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:02 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 8:57 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:41 pm
Bruce Rauner of Illinois and state worker Mark Janus are once again seated in the courtroom, for the third day in a row. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:41 am
"Interestingly, Carnes ruled for a state death row habeas petitioner in Johnson based on ineffective assistance of counsel back from 1980. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:49 am
United States and Tolentino v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CD [2011] EWHC 2087 (Admin) (29 July 2011): Control order ruled lawful: “reasonable grounds for suspecting CD is a leading figure in network of Islamist extremists” – see guardian.co.uk SCHALK AND KOPF v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:49 pm
On Monday, in Martel v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:15 pm
” [via Findlaw] State v. [read post]
