Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 14,335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2007, 9:44 pm
" Here is the abstract:This paper 1) notices that Booker uprooted the statutory basis for the departure concept, suggesting that courts are at liberty to deviate from precedent rooted in the pre-Booker concept; 2) explains why Rule 32(i)(1)(C) as read by Burns v United States requires notice prior to sua sponte non-Guidelines sentences in those jurisdictions that require a distinct legal determination if a non-Guidelines sentence is warranted; and 3) discusses why such… [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 3:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 5:55 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 11:02 pm
Slaughter v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am
[with implications for the pending Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 7:33 am
” It’s the law of the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 3:35 am
Lewis, and the 5th District’s decision earlier this year in State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:12 pm
IndianaUniv-v-MidAmerica-Complaint-logo [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
A decision should be out later in the year.On the most recent decision (State of Calif. v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am
After two days of argument (spread over three days due to the State Opening of Parliament) judgment was reserved. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
Dean v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 12:15 pm
On July 4th, we celebrate the birthday of the United State of America. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:46 am
Mengden IV PDF Note Yellowbear v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 5:26 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 8:54 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the United States Supreme Court overturned both Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
ALLEGATIONS OF GENOCIDE UNDER THE CONVENTION ON THEPREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE(UKRAINE v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:49 pm
In his May 9, 2014 order in Wright v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 8:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 12:43 pm
For an early articulation that seems to echo this view, see the summary of the trial judge's instructions in State v. [read post]