Search for: "State v. South"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 10,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2016, 9:49 am
In the case, Coterel v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
In the case, Hain v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:49 am
In the case, Coterel v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:25 am
” Although Ruffin’s authorship of State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:04 pm
Florida; NFIB v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:27 am
Reckitt stated that the misrepresentation was material. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 12:20 am
In Roark v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:49 am
United States Department of the Interior (Gaming; Land into Trust)Ak-Chin Indian Community v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:49 am
United States Department of the Interior (Gaming; Land into Trust)Ak-Chin Indian Community v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 12:32 pm
The March 8, 2013 Supreme Court opinion in Youngblood v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 6:52 am
In South Korea, Google will likely be fined soon over its bad-faith compliance with a statute relating to in-app payments, but if South Korea had simultaneously capped the commission (as is now being contemplated in South Africa), the situation would be clearer.One of the most interesting antitrust investigations of Google was announced by Germany's Bundeskartellamt (Federal Cartel Office) last month and relates to the licensing terms for Google Maps.While it's… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Shortly following a Supreme Court ruling last week in Williams v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:37 pm
--Court: Court of Appeals of South CarolinaOpinion Date: 9/14/11Cite: Team IA, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:26 am
The latest development in South Korea--a fact-finding inquiry by the Korea Communications Commission--may also yield significant results.Getting back to the U.S. situation, it's possible that Congress will vote on the Open App Markets Act (OAMA) at around the time of the Epic v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 11:51 pm
On September 7, 2022, the Court of Appeals published an opinion in Holland v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:39 pm
" Jameel Jaffer sums up the state of play in the ACLU's work to expose illegal surveillance. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:43 pm
Supreme Court decision, Screws v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 7:59 am
The plaintiffs in the suit were Arkansas, Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:52 am
Nebraska, Tennessee, Idaho, Kentucky and South Dakota rescinded their ratifications but Article V does not explicitly give states the ability to rescind. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:24 am
The Plaintiffs’ Son Suffers a Serious Leg Injury, and the Defendant Seeks to Compel Arbitration The plaintiffs in the case of Alicea v. [read post]
