Search for: "State v. Sullivan"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 2,731
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2010, 7:24 am
Florida, No. 08-7412, and Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:05 am
The decision below is here; the only discussion there is: The petitioner failed to demonstrate “proper cause” for the issuance of a “full carry” permit (Penal Law § 400.00[2][f]; Matter of Hecht v Bivona, 11 AD3d 614; Matter of Sarro v Smith, 8 AD3d 395; Matter of Bando v Sullivan, 290 AD2d 691). [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:15 am
Distinguishing between an individual’s “domicile” and his or her “residence” for the purpose of meeting a “residence requirement” for employmentMatter of Ball v City of Syracuse, 2010 NY Slip Op 01037, decided on February 11, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Syracuse City Charter provides that employees "shall be at the time of their appointment and continue to be during their continuance in the employment of the city, residents of… [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 6:33 am
Gelstein, the New York Court of Appeals noted: Under the [New York] Times [Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254)] malice standard, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the “statements [were] made with [a] high degree of awareness of their probable falsity” (Garrison v Louisiana, 379 US 64, 74). [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 8:16 am
United States and Shell Oil v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 11:48 am
The seminal Supreme Court case New York Times v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:27 am
Hinnigan In Sullivan v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:27 am
Hinnigan In Sullivan v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 12:12 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), which affords First Amendment protection to reporters against frivolous suits. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:12 am
The case of Regions Bank v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:04 pm
See, e.g., Lewis v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:01 am
Hurley Int'l LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:52 pm
Sullivan and the Pentagon Papers case. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 1:22 pm
Sullivan, No. 101,850 (Oct. 16, 2009); Wm. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
A case like State v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:50 pm
Expect Harpdrygal V to be a blast this year! [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 7:37 am
(father) v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
