Search for: "The Examiner"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 161,775
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2008, 4:02 pm
The Maryland Court of Appeals reversed a criminal conviction, finding error in the cross-examination of the defendant concerning the timing and content of his conversations with his attorney. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 1:57 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed a decision of the Board of Bar Examiners to not award damages to an applicant who claimed a breach of accomodations In July 2021, Murphy sat for the Delaware Bar Exam after requesting and receiving... [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 3:34 pm
The Florida Board of Bar Examiners voted to adopt a formal policy review applicants' social networking sites on a case-by-case basis, according to this recent report in Florida Bar News. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 9:39 am
The current preneed examination procedures contemplate an onsite visit to each seller. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:03 am
At his IME (independent medical examination), a friend of the plaintiff interpreted the doctor's examination. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
Ken Blackstone is an expert regarding polygraph examinations. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:19 am
Rule No. 7 of 12: The successful cross-examiner listens to the witness's direct testimony. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:09 pm
The memo sent to patent examiners provides discussion of McRo, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
“Along with recent changes to the examiner count system and the revised PAP for supervisory patent examiners, I believe this is an important step forward that will help create a foundation for future USPTO success. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 7:48 am
For example, the increase followed the introduction in 1999 of a new form of re-examination proceeding allowing greater participation by a third-party re-examination requester. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 10:28 am
In cross examination, it makes no sense to go over all the points made during direct examination. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:42 am
Trustee moved for disqualification of the debtor’s counsel after he informed them that he would be representing the debtor’s spouse at the examination, but before the examination took place. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm
This evaluation, the first of its kind, will examine the impact, processes and cost-effectiveness of Juvenile Drug Courts implementing the Reclaiming Futures model. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:52 pm
An appellate court recently examined the covenant of good faith and fair dealing in New Jersey construction contracts in the case of Konopka vs. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 12:57 pm
A New Jersey appeals court recently examined the evidence necessary to establish a claim of whistleblower retaliation under the New Jersey Conscientious Employee Protection Act, New Jersey’s Whistleblower Law, in the case of Carol Smith vs. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 8:32 am
When patent applicants receive a final rejection from the USPTO, they currently have three options: (1) appeal the final rejection, (2) abandon the application, or (3) amend the claims and file a request for continued examination (RCE). [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 1:17 pm
The New York Law Journal published an interesting article this morning, which examines the impact that say-on-pay rules have had in the U.K. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 6:09 am
CNN reports a year-long investigation from the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists “examined more than 8 million device-related health records, including death and injury reports,” and “found nearly 83,000 deaths and more than 1.7 million injuries possibly linked to medical devices and reported in the United States alone since 2008. [read post]
17 May 2021, 10:25 am
The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court recently examined some of these ramifications in its opinion in the case of Gilbert vs. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
After the plaintiff’s expert was proposed to the court, the defendant requested that their expert be permitted to perform a physical examination on the plaintiff, arguing that a jury would give more weight to the plaintiff’s expert testimony merely because he was able to perform a full physical examination. [read post]
